Go to November Time-Gate

dd
Result: Fail

Ok. So for the first time in months we broke our 100% perfect formation streak. The good news is we believe we have found the reason for this failure. This failure was attributed to the fact that geomagnetic readings were slightly out of the sweet spot range. Also the S&P 500 had just had a roaring week a few days prior, representing an oversold market, where geomagnetic activity was in the sweet spot of 12 during this time. Hence it may be when the market is oversold, as the sweet spot declines the accuracy in this technology declines. There are 3 more tests until the final program ends in December, so to finally confirm the hypothesis that exceedingly high geomagnetic readings are creating major interference, we will be using real time geomagnetic forecast readings before each time the equipment is activated.

Geomagnetic Forecast Data
https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/3-day-forecast

https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/wsa-enlil-solar-wind-prediction

https://www.sws.bom.gov.au

https://www.spaceweather.gov/products/27-day-outlook-107-cm-radio-flux-and-geomagnetic-indices

When we take a look at the real time geomagnetic activity that took place when the equipment was activated we see a huge KP storm. The effects of this must have been so strong they rippled back through time to the date the equipment was operated, causing the failure.

dddd

dd

As shown, this was the largest geomagnetic storm occuring for the previous 30 days. Years of experience has taught us that whenever there is major geomagnetic activity occuring within the next 3 days of the time the equipment is activated, the results are always negative because this puts out lots of interferrence.

This proves that when the geomagnetic readings are in the sweet spot range results are almost perfect. This proves that earth's geomagnetic field influences our subconscious mind. The way we receive information from future events may be due to the fact that we are conduits or vessels for information which passes through our subconscious mind. Reviewing almost 3 years of Associative Remote Viewing Stock Market Data, including 1 year of using the PSI Chips, we get the following results:

Using the High Latitude College Indice Number
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/swpc-products/annual_reports/daily_solar_indices_summaries/daily_geomagnetic_data/
Data over the approximate 3 year range documenting 38 Associative Remote Viewing Sessions shows that the "sweet spot" for the High Latitude College Indice Number is between 11 and 20, centred near the accurate average of about 14.

On average, the 11 to 20 range is where accurate results concentrate: 10 accurate against 2 not accurate, about 83%. All four entries from 16 to 20 were accurate. The 6 to 10 range has just as many accurate entries, but it also has as many inaccurate ones, so it is a coin flip. Above 20, inaccurate results outnumber accurate ones. The single most frequent accurate value is 8, with four accurate results and one inaccurate. Overall, the best results cluster between 11 and 20, centred near the accurate average of about 14.

M Class Solar Flares
The most telling sign was there were numerous M class flares a few days before as well as in the coming days. Unlike the C class solar flares which are very mild, the M class flares are very powerful and create  a lot of geomagnetic activity.  Future protocols will be desiged to check these before the sessions commence, or re-schedule the session if M class flares are present or could occur in the near future.  This is because the forecasted geomagnetic activity does not display this when M class flares occur.


ddd
Reference
https://services.swpc.noaa.gov/text/daily-solar-indices.txt


 ddd


d

Lunar Phase
Accurate results cluster in two places: just before Full Moon and around New Moon.
dd


Moon Apogee and Perigee (distance the moon is from the earth)
d
On its own, distance does not separate the results. Accurate tests made up 7 of 12 near perigee (under 380,000 km) and 9 of 16 near apogee (over 395,000 km), roughly the same share.

Three test dates fell within about two days of a supermoon, using the common cutoff of under 360,000 km at New or Full Moon. All three were Super New Moons, which are not visible:

8 Apr 2024 (value 9) was accurate. It fell on the day of the Super New Moon, 359,807 km away.
10 Apr 2024 (value 11) was accurate, two days after the same Super New Moon.
31 Mar 2025 (value 6) was not accurate. It came two days after the 29 Mar Super New Moon, 358,691 km away.

None of the dates was near a Super Full Moon. Two accurate dates also fell on total solar eclipses: 8 Apr 2024 and 12 Aug 2026.

Overall, phase matters more than distance in this data. Full Moon and New Moon have the best accuracy rates, while apogee versus perigee shows no real difference. With 38 tests, these patterns are suggestive, not conclusive.

In Summary, the PSI Chips are acting as an amplifier. When geomagnetic activity is in the sweet range the results are spectacular, when not, the results are a spectacular disaster.

In summary the best model we have so far is:
 Other benefical conditions include


The full data analysis dates for the above, including links to the approximate last 3 years worth of associative remote viewing data are included in his research report.


There are a number of well respected scientific published studies documenting the effects of geomagnetic activity on the human nervous system:

The Global Coherence Initiative: Creating a Coherent Planetary Standing Wave
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3833489/
 
Global Coherence Research: Human-Earth Interconnectivity
https://www.heartmath.org/research/science-of-the-heart/global-coherence-research/
HeartMath researchers analyzed magnetic field flux gate data from two Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES-8 and GOES-10). They reported a significant spike in magnetic field variability starting on the morning of September 11, 2001, which they attributed to a global surge of human emotional stress and mass consciousness focus.
McCraty, R. (2004). "The Energetic Heart: Bioelectromagnetic Interactions Within and Between People." HeartMath Research Center Report.
https://www.heartmath.org/research/science-of-the-heart/global-coherence-research/

Core Focus: Examines 31-day continuous monitoring of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in human subjects, reporting statistical correlations between autonomic nervous system rhythms and low-frequency geomagnetic field variations.
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Stolc, V., Alabdulgader, A. A., Vainoras, A., & Ragulskis, M. (2017). "Synchronization of Human Autonomic Nervous System Rhythms with Geomagnetic Activity in Human Subjects." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 770.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/770

Core Focus: Evaluates HRV changes in participants relative to space weather indices ($Kp$, $Ap$, and solar wind speed), asserting that human cardiovascular dynamics track environmental magnetic fields.
Alabdulgader, A., McCraty, R., et al. (2018). "Long-Term Study of Heart Rate Variability Responses to Changes in the Solar and Geomagnetic Environment." Scientific Reports, 8, 2663.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20932-x

Reviews epidemiological data linking geomagnetic storms to cardiovascular hospital admissions and circadian disruption. Reviews epidemiological data linking geomagnetic storms to cardiovascular hospital admissions and circadian disruption. Palmer, S. J., Rycroft, M. J., & Cermack, M. (2006)
https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-006-9010-7

Analyzed physiological metrics in healthy subjects across varying space weather conditions, finding autonomic shifts during high geomagnetic activity.
Babayev, E. S., & Allahverdiyeva, A. A. (2007)    Effects of geomagnetic activity variations on the physiological and psychological state... (Advances in Space Research)
https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.02.046

Evaluated correlations between global geomagnetic indices and sudden cardiac death rates across multi-decade temporal datasets.
St-Pierre, L. S. / Stoupel, E., et al. (2008/2002)    Sudden cardiac death and geomagnetic activity (International Journal of Biometeorology)
https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0146-5



Looking at our historical data for Estimated Planetary K-Indices we shall interpret the data as follows:
 
Date is the day of the ARV session

>> # >>  is the High Latitude College Indice Number taken from the NOAA Historical Geomagnetic Index Activity
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/swpc-products/annual_reports/daily_solar_indices_summaries/daily_geomagnetic_data/

Formation is where the ARV session yielded a positive formation in that the overall drawing was accurate enough similar to the actual S&P 500 activity.


2026 Data Archive
https://www.in2itivetech.com/year_2026_psi_chip_tech.html

Oct 9th >> (awaiting data) >> Formation Not Accurate

Sept 9th >> 26 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/sepst_2026.html

Aug 12th >> 15 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/august_2026.html

July 16th >> UNK >> Formation Accurate (NOAA did not post data for this date) Estimated to be in the range of >>> 7 >>>
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/july_2026_tech_demonstration.html

June 23rd >> 8 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/june_2026_tech_demonstration.html

May 1st >> 20 >> Formation Accurate  
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/may_2026_tech_demonstration.html

April 1st >> 8 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/early_april_2026.html

April 30th >> 17 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/FINAL_TESTING/may_2026_tech_demonstration.html

March 2nd >> 3 >> Formation not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/early_march_2026.html

March 31st >> 16  >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/early_april_2026.html

Feb 10th >> 10 >> Formation not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/feb_18_2026.html

Feb 5th >> 23 >>  Formation not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/feb_2026.html

Jan 8th >> 15 >> Success in choosing stocks (early chip research)
https://www.in2itivetech.com/2026.html

2025 Data Archive
https://www.in2itivetech.com/history.html

May 9th >> 24 >>  Formation Not Accurate
https://in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/in_depth_fri_may_25.html

April 10th >> 30 >> Formation Accurate
https://in2itivetech.com/in_depth_fri_apr_25.html

March 31st >> 6 >> Formation not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_test_march_25.html

March 19th >> 42 >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_31.html

Feb 19th >> 19 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_30.html

Jan 23rd >> 9 >>  Formation not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_29.html

2024 Data Archive
https://www.in2itivetech.com/history.html

Dec 27th >> 2 >> Formation not Accurate
https://in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/beta_28.html

Dec 3rd >> 8 >> Formation not Accurate
https://in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/beta_27.html

November 26th >> 12 >> Formation Accurate
https://in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_into_pre_trial_runs/beta_26.html

August 16th >> 11 >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_23_24.html

July 19th >> 3 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_23_24.html

June 20th >> 8 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

June 18th >> 23  >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

June 3rd >> 11 >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 23rd >> 21 >>  Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 21st >> 2 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 19th >> 13 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 15th >> 10 >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 8th >> 5 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html
 
May 3rd >> 10 >>  Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/beta_tests_second_moedule.html

May 1st >> 6 >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 22nd >> 13 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 19th >> 46 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 15th>> 2  >> Formation Not Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 10th >> 11 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 8th >> 9 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 1st >> 14 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html

April 3rd >> 8 >> Formation Accurate
https://www.in2itivetech.com/navigation_history.html


Master Reference Used:
NOAA Master Daily Geomagnetic Archive
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/swpc-products/annual_reports/daily_solar_indices_summaries/daily_geomagnetic_data/


  Go to November Time-Gate